Kirk had an outstanding freshman debut for Texas A&M and earned playing time over more veteran receivers who had previous produced for the Aggies. In 2015, Kirk caught 80 passes for 1,009 yards with seven touchdowns. He averaged only 19.3 yards per kick return, but averaged 24.4 yards per punt returns with two touchdowns. Kirk is a fast, explosive play-maker. Some scouting sources have said there nickname for Kirk is "Baby Beckham" in reference to Odell Beckham Jr.
Ridley had a tremendous debut for Alabama and became the Crimson Tide's No. 1 receiver as a freshman. As a replacement for Amari Cooper, Ridley was very effective with 89 receptions for 1,045 yards with seven touchdowns. He finished the 2015 season with impressive performances against Florida and Michigan State to help push Alabama to the National Championship. Ridley has size, speed, and a ton of upside for the NFL.
viernes, 23 de septiembre de 2016
2019 NFL Draft Fullbacks
Flowers is thick lead blocker for the Sooners. In 2015, he caught eight passes for 130 yards with four touchdowns. Flowers also plays on special teams, and that will be huge for his NFL hopes.
90-100 Rare Prospect
Player demonstrates rare abilities and can create mismatches that have an obvious impact on the game. Is a premier college player that has all the skill to take over a game and play at a championship level. He rates in the top 5 players in the nation at his position and is considered a first round draft prospect.
80-89 Outstanding Prospect
Player has abilities to create mismatches versus most opponents in the NFL. A feature player that has an impact on the outcome of the game. Cannot be shut down by a single player and plays on a consistent level week in and week out. He rates in the top 10 at his position and is considered a second round draft prospect.
70-79 Solid Prospect
Still a standout player at the college level that is close to being an elite player. He has no glaring weaknesses and will usually win his individual matchups, but does not dominate in every game, especially when matched up against the top players in the country. He will usually rate in the top third of players at his position and is considered a third round draft prospect.
60-69 Good Prospect
This player is an good starter that will give a solid effort week in and week out, but he is overmatched versus the better players in the nation. His weaknesses will be exposed against top competition. He is usually a prospect that is missing something from his game. For example, he has the size and skills to be an outstanding prospect, but lacks the speed. He will usually rate in the top half of the players at his position and is considered a middle round draft choice.
50-59 Adequate Prospect
These are usually players that play at a high level in college, but lack some measurables or skills to play at that same level in the NFL. He may be a player that has a lot of developmental qualities, or could be a player that will contribute right away on special teams or in a situational capacity. He will usually rate in the second-third at his position and is considered a fifth round draft choice.
21-49 Borderline Draft Prospect
These are players that teams like something about, but certainly do not have the full package in terms of NFL talent. A lot of times, teams will take chances on character players or developmental type athletes with this grade. And often, these are players that come from smaller schools or did not standout at the college level. NFL teams are looking for 'diamonds in the rough' with this type of prospect. He will usually rate in the bottom third of players at his position and will be considered a late round draft choice or un-drafted free agent.
20 Free Agent Prospect
These are players that did not make our original 'evaluation list' but are prospects that need to be monitored. Especially in the pre-season, these players will fluctuate up and down depending on performance in their final year of eligibility.
10 Not a legitimate Prospect
These are players that lack NFL measurables and/or skills. They are players that we feel would not even make a solid contribution as a training camp body.
90-100 Rare Prospect
Player demonstrates rare abilities and can create mismatches that have an obvious impact on the game. Is a premier college player that has all the skill to take over a game and play at a championship level. He rates in the top 5 players in the nation at his position and is considered a first round draft prospect.
80-89 Outstanding Prospect
Player has abilities to create mismatches versus most opponents in the NFL. A feature player that has an impact on the outcome of the game. Cannot be shut down by a single player and plays on a consistent level week in and week out. He rates in the top 10 at his position and is considered a second round draft prospect.
70-79 Solid Prospect
Still a standout player at the college level that is close to being an elite player. He has no glaring weaknesses and will usually win his individual matchups, but does not dominate in every game, especially when matched up against the top players in the country. He will usually rate in the top third of players at his position and is considered a third round draft prospect.
60-69 Good Prospect
This player is an good starter that will give a solid effort week in and week out, but he is overmatched versus the better players in the nation. His weaknesses will be exposed against top competition. He is usually a prospect that is missing something from his game. For example, he has the size and skills to be an outstanding prospect, but lacks the speed. He will usually rate in the top half of the players at his position and is considered a middle round draft choice.
50-59 Adequate Prospect
These are usually players that play at a high level in college, but lack some measurables or skills to play at that same level in the NFL. He may be a player that has a lot of developmental qualities, or could be a player that will contribute right away on special teams or in a situational capacity. He will usually rate in the second-third at his position and is considered a fifth round draft choice.
21-49 Borderline Draft Prospect
These are players that teams like something about, but certainly do not have the full package in terms of NFL talent. A lot of times, teams will take chances on character players or developmental type athletes with this grade. And often, these are players that come from smaller schools or did not standout at the college level. NFL teams are looking for 'diamonds in the rough' with this type of prospect. He will usually rate in the bottom third of players at his position and will be considered a late round draft choice or un-drafted free agent.
20 Free Agent Prospect
These are players that did not make our original 'evaluation list' but are prospects that need to be monitored. Especially in the pre-season, these players will fluctuate up and down depending on performance in their final year of eligibility.
10 Not a legitimate Prospect
These are players that lack NFL measurables and/or skills. They are players that we feel would not even make a solid contribution as a training camp body.
2019 NFL Draft Running Backs
Fournette came to LSU with a huge amount of hype, including comparisons to Adrian Peterson. As a sophomore, Fournette showed why the hype was justified as he was terrific. He was in the running as the best player in the country as he carried the program. Fournette averaged 6.5 yards per carry on the year for 1,953 yards with 22 touchdowns, plus caught 19 passes for 253 yards with a touchdown. He had a number of long gains called back as well.
There is no doubt that Fournette is a special player. He is a powerful downhill runner who can run over tacklers, yet has a burst to break off long runs and run away from defenders. Fournette also has moves in the open field with elusiveness to avoid tacklers. He is a natural athlete and showed impressive receiving skills as a sophomore.
Fournette is a threat to score every time he touches the ball. He looks like a future franchise player and Pro Bowl running back if he can stay healthy. His play thus far has made him worthy of the Adrian Peterson comparisons.
Fournette had a strong freshman season in 2014, averaging 5.5 yards per carry on 187 rushes for 1,034 yards and 10 touchdowns.
There is no doubt that Fournette is a special player. He is a powerful downhill runner who can run over tacklers, yet has a burst to break off long runs and run away from defenders. Fournette also has moves in the open field with elusiveness to avoid tacklers. He is a natural athlete and showed impressive receiving skills as a sophomore.
Fournette is a threat to score every time he touches the ball. He looks like a future franchise player and Pro Bowl running back if he can stay healthy. His play thus far has made him worthy of the Adrian Peterson comparisons.
Fournette had a strong freshman season in 2014, averaging 5.5 yards per carry on 187 rushes for 1,034 yards and 10 touchdowns.
2019 NFL Draft Prospects
Many feel that Rosen would be the top quarterback for the 2019 NFL Draft if he were eligible. Rosen had an impressive debut as a freshman, completing 60 percent of his passes for 3,670 yards with 23 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. He showed off a powerful arm and the ability to be an NFL pocket passer. While Rosen has gotten a ton of hype, the same thing happened with Christian Hackenberg after his freshman season. Thus, Rosen still has more to prove as a sophomore and junior to be a high first-rounder.
Quarterbacks
Deshaun Watson, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: The combination of arm talent and athleticism are unmatched in college football as Watson combines the ability to make special throws while keeping defense off balance with running skills that can be used for both scrambling and designed runs. Whether dropping downfield passes in the bucket or zipping slants and posts over the middle, Watson can make the necessary throws to create big plays in the NFL.
What we’d like to see: Like many spread quarterbacks, Watson has little experience working through progressions and it’s unlikely a place in which he’ll have an opportunity to improve this season. A bigger concern is the inconsistent short-area accuracy. He often garners comparisons to Carolina Panthers QB Cam Newton and the combination of special throws and easy misses does resemble last year’s NFL MVP. We’d like to see Watson tie up some of those accuracy issues this season.
Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma State
Why he’s on the list: Rudolph’s arm allows him to make special throws at the intermediate and deep level, whether it’s putting the ball right along the sideline on the deep out or allowing receivers to make plays down the field. He had the top grade on deep passes last season and that makes him a good fit for a vertical passing game at the next level.
What we’d like to see: After backup quarterback J.W. Walsh stole a number of Rudolph’s red zone snaps, we’d like to see his work in the passing game in those crucial short areas. The other big part of Rudolph’s game that is lacking is his accuracy when working toward his second read. While he often gets there, he misses too many throws and it’s perhaps the most important part of his game that must improve.
Luke Falk, Washington State
Why he’s on the list: Using a quick release and good touch, Falk does a nice job of finding open receivers in zones and hitting them with good ball location. He doesn’t have great zip on the ball, but he makes up for it with his release. Falk does his best work at the intermediate level of the field.
What we’d like to see: Falk must become a better decision-maker, particularly over the middle of the field. The same skills that allow him to find receivers in between zones also get him into trouble as he floats far too many passes that give linebackers and safeties a chance for interceptions. Improving his arm strength a touch could help mitigate some of those risky throws.
Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma
Why he’s on the list: Mayfield emerged as one of the nation’s top quarterbacks last season, carrying Oklahoma to the College Football Playoff. He didn’t miss many throws and he can throw the ball with impressive zip or take something off for downfield touch passes. Mayfield handles pressure well and he can move the chains with his legs when the situation calls for it.
What we’d like to see: Mayfield has been an underdog since winning the starting job at Texas Tech as a walk-on in 2013, and we’re asking him to prove that 2015 was not a fluke. Another dominant season will be difficult to ignore, especially if he can spread the ball around while losing his top playmaker, Sterling Shepard. Another area of concern, Mayfield was charged with 10 sacks last season, and that’s a number that must be cut down.
Brad Kaaya, Miami
Why he’s on the list: Kaaya stepped right in as a starter as a true freshman in 2014 and while he’s had his bumps along the way, he showed great improvement last season. He works through progressions quickly and he’s not afraid of making tight-window throws which are often followed by impressive ball placement. He appears adept at working the short passing game and he’s a good fit for west coast concepts at the next level.
What we’d like to see: Kaaya gets touted for having a big arm, but the zip doesn’t always appear to be there. As impressive as some of his throws are, he’ll come back with others that miss by a mile. If we can see an uptick in arm strength, and better throw for throw consistency, Kaaya will start to look like the first round prospect many have projected for him. Playing in new head coach Mark Richt’s system is also going to be a key storyline for him this season.
Running Backs
Leonard Fournette, LSU
Why he’s on the list: Fournette lived up to the five-star hype with a huge sophomore season that saw him break more tackles than any other running back in the nation. Always a powerful, straight-line back, it was Fournette impressed by adding more wiggle to his game from his freshman to sophomore season and showing the ability to string multiple moves together in a way that he hadn’t previously shown.
What we’d like to see: Just as freshman to sophomore year was a massive development jump for Fournette, another step forward could vault him into one of the best running back prospects in years. Whether that occurs or not, simply seeing more out of him in the passing game, from route variety to pass protection, will diversify his skillset as it’s still a pass-first NFL and those skills are vital to warrant a top-round pick.
Dalvin Cook, Florida State
Why he’s on the list: The most explosive running back in the nation, Cook has the ability to turn the slightest run-blocking crease into a touchdown. That game-changing ability has led to a number of comebacks by Florida State as few running backs can carry a team like Cook.
What we’d like to see: While Cook’s big-play ability is as good as it gets, with so many of his yards coming as a result of big plays, we’d like to see more of the one to two-yard gains turn into four or five in order to keep the offense on schedule. Like other running backs on the list, we’d also like to see more diverse looks in the passing game to prove that Cook can be a dynamic, movable piece at the next level.
Christian McCaffrey, Stanford
Why he’s on the list: If McCaffrey were just a slot receiver, he’d be a top prospect, but he’s actually a scheme-diverse runner, and that puts him in the first-round mix. He sets up blocks well, and his change of direction skills allow him to hit the hole quickly. As a receiver, he runs good routes from multiple alignments creating mismatches along the way. That diverse skillset make McCaffrey a perfect fit for the more spread-oriented NFL.
What we’d like to see: This season will be a challenge for McCaffrey as Stanford replaces three good offensive linemen and quarterback Kevin Hogan. He’ll be the focal point for opposing defenses, so Stanford may need to tap into his skills to get him the ball in creative ways. McCaffrey is extremely dangerous once he gets to the second level, so breaking in three new linemen may limit those opportunities so we’d like to see how he handles what should be a less-favorable snap-for-snap blocking situation up front.
Nick Chubb, Georgia
Why he’s on the list: When healthy, Chubb’s combination of size, speed, and receiving ability remind of former Jaguars running back Maurice Jones-Drew. Though they don’t have the same body type, Chubb’s ability to run through tacklers while hitting the edge with speed make him an efficient, yet dangerous runner. He’s also excellent at maximizing the yards the line blocks for him, often an underrated skill in the evaluation process. If he returns to health after a season-ending knee injury, Chubb is right near the top of this running back class.
What we’d like to see: Health is the most crucial component for Chubb, so from a draft perspective, even if he starts slow and regains form toward the end of the year, it should be enough to warrant first-round consideration. Other than that, we’d like to see a return to his freshman form when he was a receiving weapon out of the backfield.
Royce Freeman, Oregon
Why he’s on the list: Few 230-pound running backs can move like Freeman as he has impressive speed and enough power and wiggle to force the third-most tackles in the nation last season. He gets a lot of free space in Oregon’s scheme, but in a downhill scheme at the next level, he can do damage. Freeman has also been solid in the pass game doing most of his work on screens and check downs but showing the occasional ability to get behind the defense on wheel routes or go routes when lined up wide.
What we’d like to see: While he’s shown the footwork to get out of trouble in tight areas, it’d be nice to see more of this given the room Oregon’s scheme generally creates. We’d also like to see Oregon use his aforementioned receiving skills more often, moving him around and allowing for more route variety.
Wide receivers
Corey Davis, Western Michigan
Why he’s on the list: With two years grading as a top-seven receiver, Davis combines nifty route running with good body control and after-the-catch ability. He projects as a strong intermediate threat, capable of separating on dig and comeback routes while sneaking behind the defense at times more due to his route running than his speed.
What we’d like to see: Davis is not a blazer, so if he can show an uptick in speed his senior year, that will be a bonus. While he has plenty of highlight-reel downfield catches on tape, making those contested catches more consistently while showing more strength at the top of his routes are two things that can improve his already-polished game. Of course, playing in the MAC will always raise questions about competition, so dominating his games against Power-5 Northwestern and Illinois will be crucial.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, USC
Why he’s on the list: Smith-Schuster is a big play waiting to happen whether he’s using his speed to get behind the defense or catching a short pass and turning upfield quickly to create yards after the catch. His speed helps to create separation on curl routes and he can be an effective underneath weapon on drag routes and screens.
What we’d like to see: Smith-Schuster’s production tailed off as the season progressed, so avoiding that tailspin is important. While he can get behind the defense, he could do a better job of making catches in contested situations.
Mike Williams, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: Williams was ready to form one of the nation’s best quarterback-receiver combinations with Deshaun Watson but he missed all of 2015. When healthy, he tracks the ball extremely well down the field, making him a big-play threat.
What we’d like to see: It’s all about health for Williams who has to show that he’s full recovered from last season’s neck injury. Between staying on the field and showing his pre-injury speed, it’s a big year for Williams.
Malachi Dupre, LSU
Why he’s on the list: A smooth runner with the speed to challenge the defense down the field, Dupre can track the ball extremely well, making him a downfield threat. Dupre does a nice job running the vertical route tree.
What we’d like to see: The volume hasn’t been there for Dupre, or his teammate Travin Dural for that matter. We’d like to see him targeting more often, particularly in the middle of the field where he doesn’t consistently catch the ball in traffic.
Mack Hollins, North Carolina
Why he’s on the list: Size and speed. Hollins gets on cornerbacks quickly with his long strides and he can break down and run the intermediate route or run right by them for big plays. He averaged 24.8 yards/reception last season.
What we’d like to see: Hollins needs to do a better job of catching the ball as he dropped six of 36 catchable targets last season. If he can be a bigger part of UNC’s offense from a volume standpoint, we could see similar production to Mike Evans in his last year at Texas A&M when he emerged as one of the nation’s top receivers.
Tight ends
Jake Butt, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Smooth route running allows Butt to create separation at the intermediate level, leading to the top receiving grade among returning tight ends. While he’s not a great blocker, he faces a lot of challenging matchups in Michigan’s pro style system, and there are a number of impressive blocks on tape.
What we’d like to see: Michigan has a chance to move Butt around the offense in order to create mismatches, so it’d be nice to see that versatility. Adding strength in the run game is the key to improving Butt’s overall game, so we’ll be keeping a close eye on his development as a run blocker.
Evan Engram, Ole Miss
Why he’s on the list: Engram looks like a receiver when he runs routes, making it difficult for linebackers and safeties to keep up. As a blocker, Engram does a nice job of finding targets on the move in his H-back role in Ole Miss’ offense.
What we’d like to see: With Ole Miss’ top playmakers moving on, it’s Engram’s time to shine so we’d like to see creativity out of the offense to get the ball in his hands. He could also do a better job of in-line blocking.
O.J. Howard, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Even beyond the big plays on busted coverages in the national title game, Howard is strong after the catch as he has a good feel for making the first defender miss and maximizing the play. He was sure-handed last season, dropping only one of his 39 catchable targets. Howard is a solid run blocker, maintaining blocks in-line and showing the ability to lock on to second-level targets.
What we’d like to see: More targets. Howard’s playmaking ability should be used more often in Alabama’s offense, so hopefully we’ll get a better feel of what Howard can do in the passing game.
Jeremy Sprinkle, Arkansas
Why he’s on the list: With TE Hunter Henry moving on, it’s Sprinkle’s time to shine as one of the top options in Arkansas’ offense. He has big-play potential as his speed allows him to gain ground quickly through the secondary while he can turn a short pass into a big gain.
What we’d like to see: Sprinkle needs to show improvement as a blocker, both in-line and as a lead blocker. He’ll have plenty of opportunities in Arkansas’ pro-style system. Between the run blocking and living up to his potential as the No. 1 tight end this season, it’s a big year for Sprinkle.
George Kittle, Iowa
Why he’s on the list: As the No. 2 tight end last season, Kittle was a threat in the run and pass game. He’s capable of blocking both in-line and on the move and he can run the seam and threaten the middle of the defense.
What we’d like to see: Many of Kittle’s big plays were simply him running behind the defense so we’d like to see more pass game opportunities where he has to win one-on-one matchups. It’s also important to see him maintain his strong production as the top tight end as he only played 383 snaps last season.
Offensive tackles
Mike McGlinchey, Notre Dame
Why he’s on the list: McGlinchey enjoyed a breakout 2015 season, as he’s grown into his 6-foot-7 frame since arriving in South Bend. He’s a powerful run blocker at the point of attack and solid pass protector, and he has the frame the NFL covets at tackle.
What we’d like to see: With only one full year under his belt, McGlinchey has to prove he’s more than a one-year wonder. He’s moving to left tackle this season so that transition must go smoothly to warrant top-round consideration in the draft. He could also stand to improve as a pass blocker.
Zach Banner, USC
Why he’s on the list: At 6-foot-9, 350 pounds, Banner has impressive size, length and power. He can move defenders at the point of attack and he made great strides in pass protection last season.
What we’d like to see: Another year of strong pass protection is a must and in the run game, showing the ability to make the backside cutoff on zone plays is an important part of Banner’s game that we’ll be watching. He also needs to cut down on the 13 penalties that tied for second in the FBS.
Cam Robinson, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Robinson is cut from a mold of prototypical NFL left tackles, and just the look and his place in Alabama’s starting lineup as a true freshman have him penciled in as the top tackle in next year’s draft on many boards. The tools are evident, and they were on full display in games like his performance against Florida in 2014 when he dominated in pass protection while showing the ability to make every block in the run game.
What we’d like to see: We need to see better on-field performance that matches the hype. While the potential is there, Robinson has yet to put together the dominant performance expected of future first-round picks. Health may have been an issue in each of his first two years, so a healthy dominant season is what we’re looking for in order to slot him into the first round.
Conor McDermott, UCLA
Why he’s on the list: With a 6-foot-8 frame and two solid years in pass protection, McDermott is on the NFL’s radar. He had a strong year in the run game in 2014, so that early-career production is a good sign.
What we’d like to see: McDermott needs a more consistent season in 2016, particularly in the running game where he can allow too much penetration on the backside of running plays.
Tyrell Crosby, Oregon
Why he’s on the list: A powerful run blocker, Crosby was one of the nation’s last season. He can create movement and work off blocks to find second-level defenders.
What we’d like to see: Crosby has not been nearly as good in pass protection where he posted an average grade last season. Improvement in this area is a must for his long-term potential.
Guards and centers
Pat Elflein, Ohio State
Why he’s on the list: Elflein has been one of the nation’s best run blocking guards the last two years as he’s equally adept at creating point-of-attack movement as he is at finding a target on the move. He’ll move to center this year for the Buckeyes, potentially creating even more value for the next level.
What we’d like to see: Obviously the move to center is the biggest story for Elflein, and if he can handle the transition, he may be the top interior offensive lineman off the board. He can also stand to improve in pass protection as he’s been better in the run game to this point.
Dan Feeney, Indiana
Why he’s on the list: Few guards have matched Feeney’s production in pass protection as he’s only allowed 14 pressures on 900 attempts the last two seasons. He’s shown the ability to make the necessary run-game blocks, it’s just a matter of consistency at this point.
What we’d like to see: While he made great strides in the run game last year, Feeney has to improve in order to balance out his game. The potential is there, he just needs to cut down on the missed blocks.
Tyler Orlosky, West Virginia
Why he’s on the list: Orlosky has been one of the nation’s best centers the last two years, particularly in pass protection where he’s only allowed 10 pressures on over 1,000 attempts. He improved in the run game last season, rarely losing blocks and giving clean looks to the running backs in West Virginia’s zone-heavy system.
What we’d like to see: We’re looking for continued improvement in the run game, perhaps even more dominance at the point of attack, while maintaining his strong work in pass protection.
Forrest Lamp, Western Kentucky
Why he’s on the list: Lamp has put together two outstanding years of grading at left tackle, though his frame is likely better suited for guard. He moves efficiently and he does a nice job of getting to the second level in the running game.
What we’d like to see: Lamp needs another dominant performance this season, particularly when going against good SEC defenses like Alabama and Vanderbilt. If he can hold his own in those games, it will go a long way toward showing his long-term potential.
Colby Gossett, Appalachian State
Why he’s on the list: Splitting time between right guard and right tackle for Appalachian State last fall, Gossett caught our eye with some impressive blocks in their zone-blocking scheme. At 6-foot-6, 315-pounds, Gossett combines strong movement skills with an NFL frame and length. He improved in pass protection last season and he’s slated to play right tackle again in 2016.
What we’d like to see: Gossett’s ability to play both guard and tackle increases his value, but a dominant performance at tackle is a must to increase his value. Early-season games against Tennessee and Miami will be his showcase games.
Edge rushers
Myles Garrett, Edge, Texas A&M
Why he’s on the list: The size, length, and explosiveness is the first thing that shows on tape and he has the production to back up the hype. With 22 sacks, 20 QB hits, and 69 hurries on 651 career pass rushes, Garrett has been one of the nation’s best pass rushers since he stepped on campus as a true freshman in 2014. It’s that pass rush ability, along with improved play against the run that makes him a potential top-five pick.
What we’d like to see: Garrett improved against the run in 2015 under new defensive coordinator John Chavis, and while Chavis’ defensive ends usually know how to take on and turn back pull blocks, Garrett can stand to attack those blocks with more power in his hands. If he continues to fill out his long frame, the added power will make him even more dangerous as a run stopper and as a pass rusher.
Derek Barnett, Tennessee
Why he’s on the list: Barnett’s career will forever be linked to Garrett as they both stepped right into SEC competition and established themselves as productive players as true freshmen. Barnett is a strong run defender, using his hands to shed blocks while showing the power to set a hard edge. As a sophomore, he took his pass rushing to a new level with the nation’s No. 3 overall pass rush grade.
What we’d like to see: While can has shown the ability to pressure the quarterback, increasing his conversion rate from hurries to sacks is what will establish Barnett firmly in the first round mix. He doesn’t have the classic “twitchy” look of an elite edge rusher, and while we feel his production is more important than the look, continuing to better his athleticism in order to turn the corner quicker and perhaps add some 3-4 outside linebacker versatility can’t hurt.
Charles Harris, Missouri
Why he’s on the list: Harris enjoyed a breakout 2015 season that saw him rank ninth in the nation as a pass rusher and 10th overall among edge defenders. He picked up nearly the same number of pressures to the inside of offensive tackles as he did to the outside, in part due to perhaps the best spin move in the nation. Like Myles Garrett, Harris improved against the run in 2015 as his quick, strong hands allow him to disengage blocks.
What we’d like to see: There were few games in which Harris completely disappeared, but he managed only one pressure over the last two games against Tennessee and Arkansas. In the run game, he needs to finish better after missing 15 of 86 tackle attempts in his two years.
Deatrich Wise, Arkansas
Why he’s on the list: A late-season surge put Wise’s potential on full display as he posted a monster pass rush grade on only 258 rushes (10 sacks, 12 QB hits, 21 hurries). His pass rush productivity against Power-5 teams was bested only by first-round pick Joey Bosa of Ohio State, so he showed that he can perform against top teams. A 6-foot-6, 272-pound frame gives Wise the position flexibility to line up on the edge while kicking inside to rush against guards or perhaps grow into a 3-4 defensive end if necessary.
What we’d like to see: Obviously a half-season of work will need to carry into 2015 to warrant first-round consideration, so it’s all about seeing Wise build upon his strong finish, especially as opposing SEC teams have an offseason to prepare for him. Wise only played 117 plays against the run last year, so it’s important to show that he can be a disruptor on the edge while being able to hold up when lining up on the interior.
Tim Williams, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: No returning pass rusher has been more productive on a per-snap basis than Williams who picked up 52 pressures (11 sacks, 8 QB hits, 33 hurries) on only 147 rushes last season, giving him 65 pressures (12/9/44) on only 196 rushes the last two seasons. Williams has the burst to challenge offensive tackles on the edge and the quickness and hand usage to counter.
What we’d like to see: The big question for Williams is whether or not he can be an every-down player. He’s yet to have that opportunity at Alabama, playing only 47 snaps against the run over the last two years. It will be important to see if he gets the chance to play early downs on the edge, though he doesn’t fit the mold of the classic, power edge defender that head coach Nick Saban generally employs in the run game.
Defensive interior
Malik McDowell, Michigan State
Why he’s on the list: McDowell will see his fair share of DeForest Buckner comparisons given his 6-foot-6, 290-pound frame, and he could have a similar dominant season. Last year was a breakout for McDowell who posted the No. 3 pass rush grade among interior defensive linemen.
What we’d like to see: Like Buckner, pad level will always be a concern for McDowell so his ability to dig in against double teams and not get moved off the ball are two things we’ll be watching. McDowell’s 2015 closely-resembled Buckner’s 2014, and it’s a big leap to get to Buckner’s 2015 level but that’s the type of move that would vault McDowell into top-10 consideration.
Jonathan Allen, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Allen would have been in the first-round mix had he declared for last year’s draft, so he should be right there again next year. He’s one of the nation’s best interior pass rushers with a two-year grade that rivals the top interior rushers from the 2016 draft.
What we’d like to see: While the grades are strong against the run, Allen has been more of a rotational player the last two years, so we’d like to see him handle a heavier workload this season, especially on early downs.
Eddie Vanderdoes, UCLA
Why he’s on the list: Coming off a season-ending knee injury, Vanderdoes had a strong 2014 and he was off to a dominant start in week one last year. He can beat up and shed blockers at the point of attack in the running game and he’s adept at making plays on the ball carrier.
What we’d like to see: Pass rushing is what will determine Vanderdoes’ draft position as he’s a solid run defender but he has to affect the quarterback more consistently. The sample was small, but he was off to a good start vs. Virginia last season and if he continues to improve as a rusher, he’ll move right up draft boards.
Maurice Hurst, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Hurst was equally strong rushing the passer as he was against the run last season, producing at a high level on his 418 snaps. He can shoot gaps or push the pocket with power and he may be the best player on a loaded Michigan defensive front.
What we’d like to see: Hurst broke out last season, but the sample size is still small, so building on his impressive 418-sample is crucial. If he can have a repeat performance and turn more pressures into sacks, Hurst will become a much bigger name come draft time.
Nazair Jones, North Carolina
Why he’s on the list: Jones has graded extremely well on his 842 career snaps, using his strong hands and length to make plays against the run while also affecting the quarterback as a pass rusher. He has the long frame that 3-4 teams will covet and he’s due for a breakout 2016 season
What we’d like to see: Like others on the list, it’s all about putting the full season together for Jones. If he can maintain the same production on full-season workload, Jones will be one of the nation’s best interior defensive linemen and a potential first-round pick.
Linebackers
Zach Cunningham, Vanderbilt
Why he’s on the list: Cunningham brings length and athleticism to the position that shows up on tape as he has good range as a zone defender. That coverage ability is coveted in the NFL, and he complements it with strong work against the run due to his striking ability that allows him to shed blocks.
What we’d like to see: While Cunningham can be a disruptive run defender, he leaves too many plays on the table as evidenced by his missing one of every 9.7 tackle attempts last season, 44th among the nation’s inside linebacker. Former Notre Dame linebacker Jaylon Smith had the same missed tackle issue at Notre Dame his sophomore year and if Cunningham can make a similar improvement, he’ll take his game to the next level.
Reuben Foster, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Foster loves to get dirty in the running game as he attacks lead blockers and pullers with power, but also has the quicks to beat them to the punch with his agility. He does a nice job of reading the quarterback’s eyes in coverage and that lead to a national-high seven passes defensed a year ago.
What we’d like to see: If Foster does win on initial contact with second-level linemen, he can get engulfed; more consistent block shedding is one area for improvement. Also, like many Alabama linebackers, straight-line speed is a question mark.
Raekwon McMillan, Ohio State
Why he’s on the list: McMillan is a playmaker in the running game and he does a nice job patrolling the middle of the field in Ohio State’s zone-heavy scheme. He’s a strong tackler, missing only 13 of his 154 attempts the last two seasons and on a defense loaded with NFL talent and flashier playmakers, McMillan has quietly played excellent football.
What we’d like to see: It would be nice to see McMillan in more one-on-one situations with tight ends and there are times that he loses track of routes working behind him in zone coverage. It will also be important to see how he handles being the main cog on the defense rather than just another good player in a sea of superstars.
Jarrad Davis, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Opposing runners know when they’ve been hit by Davis who packs a punch when squared up on ball carriers. He can work downhill in the running game and he uses that same power to beat up blockers when blitzing.
What we’d like to see: Davis can get tied up at the second level by offensive linemen, especially when he’s not initiating the contact. While he’s a powerful tackler, cutting back on the whiffs should be an emphasis this season after he missed 11 of 90 attempts last season.
Calvin Munson, San Diego State
Why he’s on the list: Few linebackers have been as disruptive as Munson the last two seasons as he’s totaled 19 sacks, 11 QB hits, and 21 hurries while grading positively against the run and in coverage. His ability to attack and shed blockers has led to his strong play as a pass rusher and against the run.
What we’d like to see: Munson is not great in space, and there are some ugly plays in coverage. If he can improve athletically and tackle better (25 misses in two years), he’ll increase his potential three-down value.
Cornerbacks
Desmond King, Iowa
Why he’s on the list: Perhaps the best zone cornerback in the nation, King has excellent ball skills that have led to 11 interceptions and 16 passes defensed over the last two years. He’s also strong in run support, ranking third in the nation last season, while missing only five tackles on 138 attempts the last two seasons.
What we’d like to see: Classifying King as a “zone corner” is not a knock on his man coverage skills, but more about highlighting his skillset. Still, it’d be great to see him in more press man situations against top wide receivers.
Jalen Tabor, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Tabor can read and break on the ball as quickly as any corner in the class, helping him finish with four interceptions and 12 passes defensed on only 58 targets. He also makes quarterbacks pay for errant throws when playing zone coverage. He has the size, speed, and movement skills to be the top cornerback off the board.
What we’d like to see: A lot of Tabor’s big plays come from his educated guesses, which isn’t the worst thing in the world, but there’s a double move to be had on him every now and then. With first rounder Vernon Hargreaves III off to the NFL, we’d like to see Tabor play the boundary where he’ll get tested more often this season.
Jourdan Lewis, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Lewis will be docked by a number of teams due to a lack of height, but his 2015 performance is difficult to ignore. He plays a feisty brand of man coverage, mirroring receivers and doing a nice job of playing the ball in the air. He’s also a good run defender and solid tackler.
What we’d like to see: Lewis can get too physical at times in coverage and his size does come into play against more physical receivers. He doesn’t have a big margin for error against bigger receivers, so we’d love to see him repeat the dominant performance that he showed last season.
Marlon Humphrey, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Humphrey has the length and speed to play man or zone coverage, and his on-field production was among the nation’s best last season. Some of his best work came as an underneath zone defender with his eyes on the quarterback. He’s only a redshirt sophomore so there’s still room to improve, but it was an impressive debut last for Humphrey in 2015.
What we’d like to see: While he has the speed and size to keep up with receivers down the field, Humphrey loses far too often at the catch point and that led to too many big plays (opponents averaged 15.5 yards/reception throwing his way, even excluding a fluke 73-yarder against Ole Miss). He also needs to tackle better as he missed 10 of his 52 attempts.
Cordrea Tankersley, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: Tankersley will be coveted by teams looking for long corners as he uses his 6-foot-1 frame extremely well in press coverage. His evaluations will vary based on scheme, but a big year could help him make an Eli Apple-like move toward the top of the draft.
What we’d like to see: Like many long corners, Tankersley has some issues with shiftier receivers and he can get grabby at the top of routes. Improving both of those issues will increase his versatility in the evaluation process.
Safeties
Jabrill Peppers, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Though he’ll officially be called a linebacker for Michigan this season, Peppers is still projected as more of a safety in the NFL. Still, the lines are blurring on the two positions depending on the scheme, so perhaps Peppers will be an NFL linebacker by this time next year. Regardless, it’s his attacking nature in the run game combined with the athleticism in coverage that makes Peppers a unique player. The ability to play the run, blitz effectively, and cover tight ends is coveted at the next level and Peppers brings those unique skills to the table.
What we’d like to see: We may not see as much of it, but Peppers struggled when lined up against receivers last season and that may be beyond his skillset. Still, if he could gain a step in coverage against top college slot receivers, it’s added value when transitioning to the NFL.
Eddie Jackson, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Moving cornerbacks to safety is a common NFL move and Alabama moving Jackson adds even more value to his game. He showed playmaking ability in his first year on the back end in 2015, intercepting six passes getting his hands on two others. As he continues to refine his skills, Jackson could be the best pure free safety in the draft class.
What we’d like to see: Jackson needs continued development at a new position while maintaining the coverage skills that made him a cornerback in the first place. If he cuts down on some of the big plays he was a part of last season while still being able to match up with receivers on occasion, he brings a dynamic element to an NFL secondary.
Jamal Adams, LSU
Why he’s on the list: An explosive playmaker, Adams can affect the game as an in-the-box run stopper and in coverage. He has nine passes defensed and four interceptions in his two years at LSU as he does a nice job of reading the quarterback in underneath coverage.
What we’d like to see: Adams looks to weave through traffic rather than take blocks head on, and while that leads to a number of highlight-reel tackles, it also knocks him out of position on occasion. In coverage, he can be a step late when diagnosing the play, so adding better play recognition to his athleticism will be important for the next level.
Marcus Maye, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Maye is a good box safety who can pack a punch as a tackler in the running game while keeping up with tight ends in coverage. He’s a good underneath coverage defender who has done his best work against the run, so scheme usage is crucial.
What we’d like to see: Maye isn’t great when playing more of a center field role and while he graded well in coverage, there are some ugly plays in there as well, especially when isolated against wide receivers. Better play in those areas will make him a more attractive prospect.
Nate Gerry, Nebraska
Why he’s on the list: One of the top-graded coverage safeties in 2014, Gerry does a nice job of working downhill when the play is in front of him and he’s a good fit for a two-high safety team. His playmaking skills have led to nine interceptions and five passes defensed over the last two years.
What we’d like to see: Gerry is not as smooth when working backwards, so passes over his head can be a problem. It’d be nice to see if he could handle a center field role as he’s played more split coverages in Nebraska’s scheme. Tackling has also been an issue as he’s missed 25 of his 163 attempts over the last two seasons. Ultimately, a return to 2014 if crucial for Gerry’s evaluation
Quarterbacks
Deshaun Watson, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: The combination of arm talent and athleticism are unmatched in college football as Watson combines the ability to make special throws while keeping defense off balance with running skills that can be used for both scrambling and designed runs. Whether dropping downfield passes in the bucket or zipping slants and posts over the middle, Watson can make the necessary throws to create big plays in the NFL.
What we’d like to see: Like many spread quarterbacks, Watson has little experience working through progressions and it’s unlikely a place in which he’ll have an opportunity to improve this season. A bigger concern is the inconsistent short-area accuracy. He often garners comparisons to Carolina Panthers QB Cam Newton and the combination of special throws and easy misses does resemble last year’s NFL MVP. We’d like to see Watson tie up some of those accuracy issues this season.
Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma State
Why he’s on the list: Rudolph’s arm allows him to make special throws at the intermediate and deep level, whether it’s putting the ball right along the sideline on the deep out or allowing receivers to make plays down the field. He had the top grade on deep passes last season and that makes him a good fit for a vertical passing game at the next level.
What we’d like to see: After backup quarterback J.W. Walsh stole a number of Rudolph’s red zone snaps, we’d like to see his work in the passing game in those crucial short areas. The other big part of Rudolph’s game that is lacking is his accuracy when working toward his second read. While he often gets there, he misses too many throws and it’s perhaps the most important part of his game that must improve.
Luke Falk, Washington State
Why he’s on the list: Using a quick release and good touch, Falk does a nice job of finding open receivers in zones and hitting them with good ball location. He doesn’t have great zip on the ball, but he makes up for it with his release. Falk does his best work at the intermediate level of the field.
What we’d like to see: Falk must become a better decision-maker, particularly over the middle of the field. The same skills that allow him to find receivers in between zones also get him into trouble as he floats far too many passes that give linebackers and safeties a chance for interceptions. Improving his arm strength a touch could help mitigate some of those risky throws.
Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma
Why he’s on the list: Mayfield emerged as one of the nation’s top quarterbacks last season, carrying Oklahoma to the College Football Playoff. He didn’t miss many throws and he can throw the ball with impressive zip or take something off for downfield touch passes. Mayfield handles pressure well and he can move the chains with his legs when the situation calls for it.
What we’d like to see: Mayfield has been an underdog since winning the starting job at Texas Tech as a walk-on in 2013, and we’re asking him to prove that 2015 was not a fluke. Another dominant season will be difficult to ignore, especially if he can spread the ball around while losing his top playmaker, Sterling Shepard. Another area of concern, Mayfield was charged with 10 sacks last season, and that’s a number that must be cut down.
Brad Kaaya, Miami
Why he’s on the list: Kaaya stepped right in as a starter as a true freshman in 2014 and while he’s had his bumps along the way, he showed great improvement last season. He works through progressions quickly and he’s not afraid of making tight-window throws which are often followed by impressive ball placement. He appears adept at working the short passing game and he’s a good fit for west coast concepts at the next level.
What we’d like to see: Kaaya gets touted for having a big arm, but the zip doesn’t always appear to be there. As impressive as some of his throws are, he’ll come back with others that miss by a mile. If we can see an uptick in arm strength, and better throw for throw consistency, Kaaya will start to look like the first round prospect many have projected for him. Playing in new head coach Mark Richt’s system is also going to be a key storyline for him this season.
Running Backs
Leonard Fournette, LSU
Why he’s on the list: Fournette lived up to the five-star hype with a huge sophomore season that saw him break more tackles than any other running back in the nation. Always a powerful, straight-line back, it was Fournette impressed by adding more wiggle to his game from his freshman to sophomore season and showing the ability to string multiple moves together in a way that he hadn’t previously shown.
What we’d like to see: Just as freshman to sophomore year was a massive development jump for Fournette, another step forward could vault him into one of the best running back prospects in years. Whether that occurs or not, simply seeing more out of him in the passing game, from route variety to pass protection, will diversify his skillset as it’s still a pass-first NFL and those skills are vital to warrant a top-round pick.
Dalvin Cook, Florida State
Why he’s on the list: The most explosive running back in the nation, Cook has the ability to turn the slightest run-blocking crease into a touchdown. That game-changing ability has led to a number of comebacks by Florida State as few running backs can carry a team like Cook.
What we’d like to see: While Cook’s big-play ability is as good as it gets, with so many of his yards coming as a result of big plays, we’d like to see more of the one to two-yard gains turn into four or five in order to keep the offense on schedule. Like other running backs on the list, we’d also like to see more diverse looks in the passing game to prove that Cook can be a dynamic, movable piece at the next level.
Christian McCaffrey, Stanford
Why he’s on the list: If McCaffrey were just a slot receiver, he’d be a top prospect, but he’s actually a scheme-diverse runner, and that puts him in the first-round mix. He sets up blocks well, and his change of direction skills allow him to hit the hole quickly. As a receiver, he runs good routes from multiple alignments creating mismatches along the way. That diverse skillset make McCaffrey a perfect fit for the more spread-oriented NFL.
What we’d like to see: This season will be a challenge for McCaffrey as Stanford replaces three good offensive linemen and quarterback Kevin Hogan. He’ll be the focal point for opposing defenses, so Stanford may need to tap into his skills to get him the ball in creative ways. McCaffrey is extremely dangerous once he gets to the second level, so breaking in three new linemen may limit those opportunities so we’d like to see how he handles what should be a less-favorable snap-for-snap blocking situation up front.
Nick Chubb, Georgia
Why he’s on the list: When healthy, Chubb’s combination of size, speed, and receiving ability remind of former Jaguars running back Maurice Jones-Drew. Though they don’t have the same body type, Chubb’s ability to run through tacklers while hitting the edge with speed make him an efficient, yet dangerous runner. He’s also excellent at maximizing the yards the line blocks for him, often an underrated skill in the evaluation process. If he returns to health after a season-ending knee injury, Chubb is right near the top of this running back class.
What we’d like to see: Health is the most crucial component for Chubb, so from a draft perspective, even if he starts slow and regains form toward the end of the year, it should be enough to warrant first-round consideration. Other than that, we’d like to see a return to his freshman form when he was a receiving weapon out of the backfield.
Royce Freeman, Oregon
Why he’s on the list: Few 230-pound running backs can move like Freeman as he has impressive speed and enough power and wiggle to force the third-most tackles in the nation last season. He gets a lot of free space in Oregon’s scheme, but in a downhill scheme at the next level, he can do damage. Freeman has also been solid in the pass game doing most of his work on screens and check downs but showing the occasional ability to get behind the defense on wheel routes or go routes when lined up wide.
What we’d like to see: While he’s shown the footwork to get out of trouble in tight areas, it’d be nice to see more of this given the room Oregon’s scheme generally creates. We’d also like to see Oregon use his aforementioned receiving skills more often, moving him around and allowing for more route variety.
Wide receivers
Corey Davis, Western Michigan
Why he’s on the list: With two years grading as a top-seven receiver, Davis combines nifty route running with good body control and after-the-catch ability. He projects as a strong intermediate threat, capable of separating on dig and comeback routes while sneaking behind the defense at times more due to his route running than his speed.
What we’d like to see: Davis is not a blazer, so if he can show an uptick in speed his senior year, that will be a bonus. While he has plenty of highlight-reel downfield catches on tape, making those contested catches more consistently while showing more strength at the top of his routes are two things that can improve his already-polished game. Of course, playing in the MAC will always raise questions about competition, so dominating his games against Power-5 Northwestern and Illinois will be crucial.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, USC
Why he’s on the list: Smith-Schuster is a big play waiting to happen whether he’s using his speed to get behind the defense or catching a short pass and turning upfield quickly to create yards after the catch. His speed helps to create separation on curl routes and he can be an effective underneath weapon on drag routes and screens.
What we’d like to see: Smith-Schuster’s production tailed off as the season progressed, so avoiding that tailspin is important. While he can get behind the defense, he could do a better job of making catches in contested situations.
Mike Williams, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: Williams was ready to form one of the nation’s best quarterback-receiver combinations with Deshaun Watson but he missed all of 2015. When healthy, he tracks the ball extremely well down the field, making him a big-play threat.
What we’d like to see: It’s all about health for Williams who has to show that he’s full recovered from last season’s neck injury. Between staying on the field and showing his pre-injury speed, it’s a big year for Williams.
Malachi Dupre, LSU
Why he’s on the list: A smooth runner with the speed to challenge the defense down the field, Dupre can track the ball extremely well, making him a downfield threat. Dupre does a nice job running the vertical route tree.
What we’d like to see: The volume hasn’t been there for Dupre, or his teammate Travin Dural for that matter. We’d like to see him targeting more often, particularly in the middle of the field where he doesn’t consistently catch the ball in traffic.
Mack Hollins, North Carolina
Why he’s on the list: Size and speed. Hollins gets on cornerbacks quickly with his long strides and he can break down and run the intermediate route or run right by them for big plays. He averaged 24.8 yards/reception last season.
What we’d like to see: Hollins needs to do a better job of catching the ball as he dropped six of 36 catchable targets last season. If he can be a bigger part of UNC’s offense from a volume standpoint, we could see similar production to Mike Evans in his last year at Texas A&M when he emerged as one of the nation’s top receivers.
Tight ends
Jake Butt, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Smooth route running allows Butt to create separation at the intermediate level, leading to the top receiving grade among returning tight ends. While he’s not a great blocker, he faces a lot of challenging matchups in Michigan’s pro style system, and there are a number of impressive blocks on tape.
What we’d like to see: Michigan has a chance to move Butt around the offense in order to create mismatches, so it’d be nice to see that versatility. Adding strength in the run game is the key to improving Butt’s overall game, so we’ll be keeping a close eye on his development as a run blocker.
Evan Engram, Ole Miss
Why he’s on the list: Engram looks like a receiver when he runs routes, making it difficult for linebackers and safeties to keep up. As a blocker, Engram does a nice job of finding targets on the move in his H-back role in Ole Miss’ offense.
What we’d like to see: With Ole Miss’ top playmakers moving on, it’s Engram’s time to shine so we’d like to see creativity out of the offense to get the ball in his hands. He could also do a better job of in-line blocking.
O.J. Howard, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Even beyond the big plays on busted coverages in the national title game, Howard is strong after the catch as he has a good feel for making the first defender miss and maximizing the play. He was sure-handed last season, dropping only one of his 39 catchable targets. Howard is a solid run blocker, maintaining blocks in-line and showing the ability to lock on to second-level targets.
What we’d like to see: More targets. Howard’s playmaking ability should be used more often in Alabama’s offense, so hopefully we’ll get a better feel of what Howard can do in the passing game.
Jeremy Sprinkle, Arkansas
Why he’s on the list: With TE Hunter Henry moving on, it’s Sprinkle’s time to shine as one of the top options in Arkansas’ offense. He has big-play potential as his speed allows him to gain ground quickly through the secondary while he can turn a short pass into a big gain.
What we’d like to see: Sprinkle needs to show improvement as a blocker, both in-line and as a lead blocker. He’ll have plenty of opportunities in Arkansas’ pro-style system. Between the run blocking and living up to his potential as the No. 1 tight end this season, it’s a big year for Sprinkle.
George Kittle, Iowa
Why he’s on the list: As the No. 2 tight end last season, Kittle was a threat in the run and pass game. He’s capable of blocking both in-line and on the move and he can run the seam and threaten the middle of the defense.
What we’d like to see: Many of Kittle’s big plays were simply him running behind the defense so we’d like to see more pass game opportunities where he has to win one-on-one matchups. It’s also important to see him maintain his strong production as the top tight end as he only played 383 snaps last season.
Offensive tackles
Mike McGlinchey, Notre Dame
Why he’s on the list: McGlinchey enjoyed a breakout 2015 season, as he’s grown into his 6-foot-7 frame since arriving in South Bend. He’s a powerful run blocker at the point of attack and solid pass protector, and he has the frame the NFL covets at tackle.
What we’d like to see: With only one full year under his belt, McGlinchey has to prove he’s more than a one-year wonder. He’s moving to left tackle this season so that transition must go smoothly to warrant top-round consideration in the draft. He could also stand to improve as a pass blocker.
Zach Banner, USC
Why he’s on the list: At 6-foot-9, 350 pounds, Banner has impressive size, length and power. He can move defenders at the point of attack and he made great strides in pass protection last season.
What we’d like to see: Another year of strong pass protection is a must and in the run game, showing the ability to make the backside cutoff on zone plays is an important part of Banner’s game that we’ll be watching. He also needs to cut down on the 13 penalties that tied for second in the FBS.
Cam Robinson, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Robinson is cut from a mold of prototypical NFL left tackles, and just the look and his place in Alabama’s starting lineup as a true freshman have him penciled in as the top tackle in next year’s draft on many boards. The tools are evident, and they were on full display in games like his performance against Florida in 2014 when he dominated in pass protection while showing the ability to make every block in the run game.
What we’d like to see: We need to see better on-field performance that matches the hype. While the potential is there, Robinson has yet to put together the dominant performance expected of future first-round picks. Health may have been an issue in each of his first two years, so a healthy dominant season is what we’re looking for in order to slot him into the first round.
Conor McDermott, UCLA
Why he’s on the list: With a 6-foot-8 frame and two solid years in pass protection, McDermott is on the NFL’s radar. He had a strong year in the run game in 2014, so that early-career production is a good sign.
What we’d like to see: McDermott needs a more consistent season in 2016, particularly in the running game where he can allow too much penetration on the backside of running plays.
Tyrell Crosby, Oregon
Why he’s on the list: A powerful run blocker, Crosby was one of the nation’s last season. He can create movement and work off blocks to find second-level defenders.
What we’d like to see: Crosby has not been nearly as good in pass protection where he posted an average grade last season. Improvement in this area is a must for his long-term potential.
Guards and centers
Pat Elflein, Ohio State
Why he’s on the list: Elflein has been one of the nation’s best run blocking guards the last two years as he’s equally adept at creating point-of-attack movement as he is at finding a target on the move. He’ll move to center this year for the Buckeyes, potentially creating even more value for the next level.
What we’d like to see: Obviously the move to center is the biggest story for Elflein, and if he can handle the transition, he may be the top interior offensive lineman off the board. He can also stand to improve in pass protection as he’s been better in the run game to this point.
Dan Feeney, Indiana
Why he’s on the list: Few guards have matched Feeney’s production in pass protection as he’s only allowed 14 pressures on 900 attempts the last two seasons. He’s shown the ability to make the necessary run-game blocks, it’s just a matter of consistency at this point.
What we’d like to see: While he made great strides in the run game last year, Feeney has to improve in order to balance out his game. The potential is there, he just needs to cut down on the missed blocks.
Tyler Orlosky, West Virginia
Why he’s on the list: Orlosky has been one of the nation’s best centers the last two years, particularly in pass protection where he’s only allowed 10 pressures on over 1,000 attempts. He improved in the run game last season, rarely losing blocks and giving clean looks to the running backs in West Virginia’s zone-heavy system.
What we’d like to see: We’re looking for continued improvement in the run game, perhaps even more dominance at the point of attack, while maintaining his strong work in pass protection.
Forrest Lamp, Western Kentucky
Why he’s on the list: Lamp has put together two outstanding years of grading at left tackle, though his frame is likely better suited for guard. He moves efficiently and he does a nice job of getting to the second level in the running game.
What we’d like to see: Lamp needs another dominant performance this season, particularly when going against good SEC defenses like Alabama and Vanderbilt. If he can hold his own in those games, it will go a long way toward showing his long-term potential.
Colby Gossett, Appalachian State
Why he’s on the list: Splitting time between right guard and right tackle for Appalachian State last fall, Gossett caught our eye with some impressive blocks in their zone-blocking scheme. At 6-foot-6, 315-pounds, Gossett combines strong movement skills with an NFL frame and length. He improved in pass protection last season and he’s slated to play right tackle again in 2016.
What we’d like to see: Gossett’s ability to play both guard and tackle increases his value, but a dominant performance at tackle is a must to increase his value. Early-season games against Tennessee and Miami will be his showcase games.
Edge rushers
Myles Garrett, Edge, Texas A&M
Why he’s on the list: The size, length, and explosiveness is the first thing that shows on tape and he has the production to back up the hype. With 22 sacks, 20 QB hits, and 69 hurries on 651 career pass rushes, Garrett has been one of the nation’s best pass rushers since he stepped on campus as a true freshman in 2014. It’s that pass rush ability, along with improved play against the run that makes him a potential top-five pick.
What we’d like to see: Garrett improved against the run in 2015 under new defensive coordinator John Chavis, and while Chavis’ defensive ends usually know how to take on and turn back pull blocks, Garrett can stand to attack those blocks with more power in his hands. If he continues to fill out his long frame, the added power will make him even more dangerous as a run stopper and as a pass rusher.
Derek Barnett, Tennessee
Why he’s on the list: Barnett’s career will forever be linked to Garrett as they both stepped right into SEC competition and established themselves as productive players as true freshmen. Barnett is a strong run defender, using his hands to shed blocks while showing the power to set a hard edge. As a sophomore, he took his pass rushing to a new level with the nation’s No. 3 overall pass rush grade.
What we’d like to see: While can has shown the ability to pressure the quarterback, increasing his conversion rate from hurries to sacks is what will establish Barnett firmly in the first round mix. He doesn’t have the classic “twitchy” look of an elite edge rusher, and while we feel his production is more important than the look, continuing to better his athleticism in order to turn the corner quicker and perhaps add some 3-4 outside linebacker versatility can’t hurt.
Charles Harris, Missouri
Why he’s on the list: Harris enjoyed a breakout 2015 season that saw him rank ninth in the nation as a pass rusher and 10th overall among edge defenders. He picked up nearly the same number of pressures to the inside of offensive tackles as he did to the outside, in part due to perhaps the best spin move in the nation. Like Myles Garrett, Harris improved against the run in 2015 as his quick, strong hands allow him to disengage blocks.
What we’d like to see: There were few games in which Harris completely disappeared, but he managed only one pressure over the last two games against Tennessee and Arkansas. In the run game, he needs to finish better after missing 15 of 86 tackle attempts in his two years.
Deatrich Wise, Arkansas
Why he’s on the list: A late-season surge put Wise’s potential on full display as he posted a monster pass rush grade on only 258 rushes (10 sacks, 12 QB hits, 21 hurries). His pass rush productivity against Power-5 teams was bested only by first-round pick Joey Bosa of Ohio State, so he showed that he can perform against top teams. A 6-foot-6, 272-pound frame gives Wise the position flexibility to line up on the edge while kicking inside to rush against guards or perhaps grow into a 3-4 defensive end if necessary.
What we’d like to see: Obviously a half-season of work will need to carry into 2015 to warrant first-round consideration, so it’s all about seeing Wise build upon his strong finish, especially as opposing SEC teams have an offseason to prepare for him. Wise only played 117 plays against the run last year, so it’s important to show that he can be a disruptor on the edge while being able to hold up when lining up on the interior.
Tim Williams, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: No returning pass rusher has been more productive on a per-snap basis than Williams who picked up 52 pressures (11 sacks, 8 QB hits, 33 hurries) on only 147 rushes last season, giving him 65 pressures (12/9/44) on only 196 rushes the last two seasons. Williams has the burst to challenge offensive tackles on the edge and the quickness and hand usage to counter.
What we’d like to see: The big question for Williams is whether or not he can be an every-down player. He’s yet to have that opportunity at Alabama, playing only 47 snaps against the run over the last two years. It will be important to see if he gets the chance to play early downs on the edge, though he doesn’t fit the mold of the classic, power edge defender that head coach Nick Saban generally employs in the run game.
Defensive interior
Malik McDowell, Michigan State
Why he’s on the list: McDowell will see his fair share of DeForest Buckner comparisons given his 6-foot-6, 290-pound frame, and he could have a similar dominant season. Last year was a breakout for McDowell who posted the No. 3 pass rush grade among interior defensive linemen.
What we’d like to see: Like Buckner, pad level will always be a concern for McDowell so his ability to dig in against double teams and not get moved off the ball are two things we’ll be watching. McDowell’s 2015 closely-resembled Buckner’s 2014, and it’s a big leap to get to Buckner’s 2015 level but that’s the type of move that would vault McDowell into top-10 consideration.
Jonathan Allen, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Allen would have been in the first-round mix had he declared for last year’s draft, so he should be right there again next year. He’s one of the nation’s best interior pass rushers with a two-year grade that rivals the top interior rushers from the 2016 draft.
What we’d like to see: While the grades are strong against the run, Allen has been more of a rotational player the last two years, so we’d like to see him handle a heavier workload this season, especially on early downs.
Eddie Vanderdoes, UCLA
Why he’s on the list: Coming off a season-ending knee injury, Vanderdoes had a strong 2014 and he was off to a dominant start in week one last year. He can beat up and shed blockers at the point of attack in the running game and he’s adept at making plays on the ball carrier.
What we’d like to see: Pass rushing is what will determine Vanderdoes’ draft position as he’s a solid run defender but he has to affect the quarterback more consistently. The sample was small, but he was off to a good start vs. Virginia last season and if he continues to improve as a rusher, he’ll move right up draft boards.
Maurice Hurst, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Hurst was equally strong rushing the passer as he was against the run last season, producing at a high level on his 418 snaps. He can shoot gaps or push the pocket with power and he may be the best player on a loaded Michigan defensive front.
What we’d like to see: Hurst broke out last season, but the sample size is still small, so building on his impressive 418-sample is crucial. If he can have a repeat performance and turn more pressures into sacks, Hurst will become a much bigger name come draft time.
Nazair Jones, North Carolina
Why he’s on the list: Jones has graded extremely well on his 842 career snaps, using his strong hands and length to make plays against the run while also affecting the quarterback as a pass rusher. He has the long frame that 3-4 teams will covet and he’s due for a breakout 2016 season
What we’d like to see: Like others on the list, it’s all about putting the full season together for Jones. If he can maintain the same production on full-season workload, Jones will be one of the nation’s best interior defensive linemen and a potential first-round pick.
Linebackers
Zach Cunningham, Vanderbilt
Why he’s on the list: Cunningham brings length and athleticism to the position that shows up on tape as he has good range as a zone defender. That coverage ability is coveted in the NFL, and he complements it with strong work against the run due to his striking ability that allows him to shed blocks.
What we’d like to see: While Cunningham can be a disruptive run defender, he leaves too many plays on the table as evidenced by his missing one of every 9.7 tackle attempts last season, 44th among the nation’s inside linebacker. Former Notre Dame linebacker Jaylon Smith had the same missed tackle issue at Notre Dame his sophomore year and if Cunningham can make a similar improvement, he’ll take his game to the next level.
Reuben Foster, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Foster loves to get dirty in the running game as he attacks lead blockers and pullers with power, but also has the quicks to beat them to the punch with his agility. He does a nice job of reading the quarterback’s eyes in coverage and that lead to a national-high seven passes defensed a year ago.
What we’d like to see: If Foster does win on initial contact with second-level linemen, he can get engulfed; more consistent block shedding is one area for improvement. Also, like many Alabama linebackers, straight-line speed is a question mark.
Raekwon McMillan, Ohio State
Why he’s on the list: McMillan is a playmaker in the running game and he does a nice job patrolling the middle of the field in Ohio State’s zone-heavy scheme. He’s a strong tackler, missing only 13 of his 154 attempts the last two seasons and on a defense loaded with NFL talent and flashier playmakers, McMillan has quietly played excellent football.
What we’d like to see: It would be nice to see McMillan in more one-on-one situations with tight ends and there are times that he loses track of routes working behind him in zone coverage. It will also be important to see how he handles being the main cog on the defense rather than just another good player in a sea of superstars.
Jarrad Davis, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Opposing runners know when they’ve been hit by Davis who packs a punch when squared up on ball carriers. He can work downhill in the running game and he uses that same power to beat up blockers when blitzing.
What we’d like to see: Davis can get tied up at the second level by offensive linemen, especially when he’s not initiating the contact. While he’s a powerful tackler, cutting back on the whiffs should be an emphasis this season after he missed 11 of 90 attempts last season.
Calvin Munson, San Diego State
Why he’s on the list: Few linebackers have been as disruptive as Munson the last two seasons as he’s totaled 19 sacks, 11 QB hits, and 21 hurries while grading positively against the run and in coverage. His ability to attack and shed blockers has led to his strong play as a pass rusher and against the run.
What we’d like to see: Munson is not great in space, and there are some ugly plays in coverage. If he can improve athletically and tackle better (25 misses in two years), he’ll increase his potential three-down value.
Cornerbacks
Desmond King, Iowa
Why he’s on the list: Perhaps the best zone cornerback in the nation, King has excellent ball skills that have led to 11 interceptions and 16 passes defensed over the last two years. He’s also strong in run support, ranking third in the nation last season, while missing only five tackles on 138 attempts the last two seasons.
What we’d like to see: Classifying King as a “zone corner” is not a knock on his man coverage skills, but more about highlighting his skillset. Still, it’d be great to see him in more press man situations against top wide receivers.
Jalen Tabor, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Tabor can read and break on the ball as quickly as any corner in the class, helping him finish with four interceptions and 12 passes defensed on only 58 targets. He also makes quarterbacks pay for errant throws when playing zone coverage. He has the size, speed, and movement skills to be the top cornerback off the board.
What we’d like to see: A lot of Tabor’s big plays come from his educated guesses, which isn’t the worst thing in the world, but there’s a double move to be had on him every now and then. With first rounder Vernon Hargreaves III off to the NFL, we’d like to see Tabor play the boundary where he’ll get tested more often this season.
Jourdan Lewis, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Lewis will be docked by a number of teams due to a lack of height, but his 2015 performance is difficult to ignore. He plays a feisty brand of man coverage, mirroring receivers and doing a nice job of playing the ball in the air. He’s also a good run defender and solid tackler.
What we’d like to see: Lewis can get too physical at times in coverage and his size does come into play against more physical receivers. He doesn’t have a big margin for error against bigger receivers, so we’d love to see him repeat the dominant performance that he showed last season.
Marlon Humphrey, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Humphrey has the length and speed to play man or zone coverage, and his on-field production was among the nation’s best last season. Some of his best work came as an underneath zone defender with his eyes on the quarterback. He’s only a redshirt sophomore so there’s still room to improve, but it was an impressive debut last for Humphrey in 2015.
What we’d like to see: While he has the speed and size to keep up with receivers down the field, Humphrey loses far too often at the catch point and that led to too many big plays (opponents averaged 15.5 yards/reception throwing his way, even excluding a fluke 73-yarder against Ole Miss). He also needs to tackle better as he missed 10 of his 52 attempts.
Cordrea Tankersley, Clemson
Why he’s on the list: Tankersley will be coveted by teams looking for long corners as he uses his 6-foot-1 frame extremely well in press coverage. His evaluations will vary based on scheme, but a big year could help him make an Eli Apple-like move toward the top of the draft.
What we’d like to see: Like many long corners, Tankersley has some issues with shiftier receivers and he can get grabby at the top of routes. Improving both of those issues will increase his versatility in the evaluation process.
Safeties
Jabrill Peppers, Michigan
Why he’s on the list: Though he’ll officially be called a linebacker for Michigan this season, Peppers is still projected as more of a safety in the NFL. Still, the lines are blurring on the two positions depending on the scheme, so perhaps Peppers will be an NFL linebacker by this time next year. Regardless, it’s his attacking nature in the run game combined with the athleticism in coverage that makes Peppers a unique player. The ability to play the run, blitz effectively, and cover tight ends is coveted at the next level and Peppers brings those unique skills to the table.
What we’d like to see: We may not see as much of it, but Peppers struggled when lined up against receivers last season and that may be beyond his skillset. Still, if he could gain a step in coverage against top college slot receivers, it’s added value when transitioning to the NFL.
Eddie Jackson, Alabama
Why he’s on the list: Moving cornerbacks to safety is a common NFL move and Alabama moving Jackson adds even more value to his game. He showed playmaking ability in his first year on the back end in 2015, intercepting six passes getting his hands on two others. As he continues to refine his skills, Jackson could be the best pure free safety in the draft class.
What we’d like to see: Jackson needs continued development at a new position while maintaining the coverage skills that made him a cornerback in the first place. If he cuts down on some of the big plays he was a part of last season while still being able to match up with receivers on occasion, he brings a dynamic element to an NFL secondary.
Jamal Adams, LSU
Why he’s on the list: An explosive playmaker, Adams can affect the game as an in-the-box run stopper and in coverage. He has nine passes defensed and four interceptions in his two years at LSU as he does a nice job of reading the quarterback in underneath coverage.
What we’d like to see: Adams looks to weave through traffic rather than take blocks head on, and while that leads to a number of highlight-reel tackles, it also knocks him out of position on occasion. In coverage, he can be a step late when diagnosing the play, so adding better play recognition to his athleticism will be important for the next level.
Marcus Maye, Florida
Why he’s on the list: Maye is a good box safety who can pack a punch as a tackler in the running game while keeping up with tight ends in coverage. He’s a good underneath coverage defender who has done his best work against the run, so scheme usage is crucial.
What we’d like to see: Maye isn’t great when playing more of a center field role and while he graded well in coverage, there are some ugly plays in there as well, especially when isolated against wide receivers. Better play in those areas will make him a more attractive prospect.
Nate Gerry, Nebraska
Why he’s on the list: One of the top-graded coverage safeties in 2014, Gerry does a nice job of working downhill when the play is in front of him and he’s a good fit for a two-high safety team. His playmaking skills have led to nine interceptions and five passes defensed over the last two years.
What we’d like to see: Gerry is not as smooth when working backwards, so passes over his head can be a problem. It’d be nice to see if he could handle a center field role as he’s played more split coverages in Nebraska’s scheme. Tackling has also been an issue as he’s missed 25 of his 163 attempts over the last two seasons. Ultimately, a return to 2014 if crucial for Gerry’s evaluation
2019 NFL Draft Order
Only three defensive tackles -- Alabama's Jonathan Allen, Michigan State's Malik McDowell and Utah's Lowell Lotulelei -- currently project as first-round caliber prospects. As a reflection of their standout play thus far this season and the relative lack of depth behind them, each comes off the board within the first 15 picks in this latest first-round projection.
Round 1
1. Cleveland Browns
Myles Garrett, DE, Texas A&M: Clearly, the No. 1 concern in Cleveland should be at quarterback but with an NFL-best 13 projected picks in the 2019 draft, the Browns do not necessarily need to make one the first pick of the draft. The 6-5, 262-pound Garrett has been a dominant pass rusher for the Aggies with 23.5 sacks over his first two seasons and is the No. 1 overall prospect in college football.
2. San Francisco 49ers
Deshaun Watson, QB, Clemson: Chip Kelly and the 49ers need help at quarterback even more than the Browns, and would likely be thrilled with Watson still on the board. The 2015 Heisman finalist possesses an exciting blend of athleticism, arm and smarts and wouldn't face the same challenges of acclimating to a pro-style scheme if playing for Kelly, whose up-tempo attack is similar to the one Watson has starred in at Clemson.
3. San Diego Chargers
Jabrill Peppers, SS, Michigan: Reinforcements along the offensive line or wide receiver are always possibilities in San Diego, but I think the Chargers also miss Eric Weddle at safety. Linebacker, safety, cornerback, returner - put him wherever you'd like - Peppers is a natural playmaker with the instincts and athleticism to carry over his success and versatility into the NFL. Teams are wary of young players and as only a redshirt sophomore, Peppers is certainly that but scouts are excited about his upside.
4. Jacksonville Jaguars
Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama: Frankly, I'd be shocked if the Jags are selecting this high - I think they are a legitimate contender to win the AFC South this year - but if once again picking in the top five, then the club could be looking for an upgrade at left guard, where Luke Joeckel - the No. 2 overall pick back in 2013 - is entering the final year of his rookie contract. Robinson isn't as polished in pass protection as Joeckel, but he's a mauler in the running game whose power and competitiveness could give the Jaguars some growl up front.
5. Tennessee Titans
Teez Tabor, CB, Florida: Some clubs seem to annually struggle at certain positions and with not a single cornerback from Tennessee in the modern era having earned multiple Pro Bowl nods, general manager Jon Robinson could be looking for an upgrade at the position. Tabor reminds scouts of former Florida standouts Vernon Hargreaves III and Joe Haden with his easy athleticism and knack for big plays.
6. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
SPONSORED BY COMCAST
Don’t get blindsided by DIRECTV
What happens when you sign up for DIRECTV’s latest deal? You get locked into a 2-year contract that can cost you over $3300. Make the right choice and switch to XFINITY X1.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, WR, Southern California: Sure, the Bucs already boast two of the NFL's bigger receivers in Mike Evans and Vincent Jackson, but the former is coming off of a disappointing sophomore season and the latter is 33 and a pending free agent. The 6-2, 220-pound Smith-Schuster isn't just big, he's powerful and highly competitive, making him potentially a perfect candidate to push Evans (and QB Jameis Winston) into maximizing their own undeniable potential.
7. New Orleans Saints
Jonathan Allen, DT, Alabama: While rookie Sheldon Rankins should make an immediate impact and Cam Jordan remains one of the NFL's best, the latest injury to pass rusher Hau'oli Kikaha (torn ACL) only reinforces New Orleans' lack of depth up front. Adding the versatile Allen to the mix would be a big help.
8. Detroit Lions
Leonard Fournette, RB, LSU: As arguably the best prospect in the country, Fournette should go higher than this, but the teams projected to select earlier than Detroit are already loaded (or at least heavily invested) at running back. Fournette is an exceptional talent, offering a combination of size, power and speed unmatched by any college back since Adrian Peterson. And as a division rival of his, the Lions know better than most the impact a superstar runner can have on a club.
9. Cleveland Browns (from Philadelphia)
DeShone Kizer, QB, Notre Dame: The Browns will almost certainly be spending yet another early pick on a quarterback. Kizer is only a redshirt sophomore but his combination of size, arm talent and composure, thus far, has the look of a future top 10 pick.
10. Miami Dolphins
Christian McCaffrey, RB, Stanford: If the trio of Arian Foster, Jay Ajayi and Kenyan Drake does not result in the production Miami is looking for in 2019, the Dolphins could find immediate help in the form of McCaffrey, a do-it-all threat perfectly suited to Adam Gase's up-tempo offense.
11. Tennessee Titans (from Los Angeles)
Tim Williams, OLB, Alabama: The Titans already boast two solid veteran edge rushers in Brian Orakpo and Derrick Morgan but with only 11.5 combined sacks from them last year (7.0 from Orakpo), the club could be looking to add some competition to the position. Williams has been largely a pass rush specialist for the Tide thus far, but he could learn quickly as an apprentice under Tennessee' two 30-year old outside linebackers.
12. Washington Redskins
Malik McDowell, DT, Michigan State: The culture in Washington is changing with general manager Scot McClougan valuing toughness and physicality over raw athleticism. At 6-6, 285 pounds, McDowell has the length and power to play all over the defensive line.
13. Atlanta Falcons
Reuben Foster , ILB, Alabama: The Falcons took a big step toward improving their overall physicality with the selection of safety Keanu Neal in the first round last spring. Foster, arguably the most explosive hitter in the country, would reinforce the club's goal of regaining its nastiness on defense.
14. Chicago Bears
Jamal Adams , SS, LSU: The Bears have been looking for a tone-setter at safety for years. Adams possesses the range, agility and playmaking ability to warrant comparison to former LSU (and current Arizona Cardinals ) star Tyrann Mathieu and is bigger at 6-feet, 211 pounds.
15. Houston Texans
Lowell Lotulelei, DT, Utah: The Texans have quietly assembled one of the better young rosters in the NFL. One of the obvious exceptions is at nose guard, where the aging (34) and increasingly rotund (listed at 325) Vince Wilfork is still eating up blocks. Like his older brother, Star, Lotulelei offers power and bulk at the point of attack and could earn early-round consideration if he continues to develop.
16. Buffalo Bills
Cameron Sutton , CB, Tennessee: The Bills are in fine shape at cornerback as long as the team re-signs pending free agent Stephon Gilmore in the offseason. Buffalo Bulls could opt to place the franchise tag on the talented cover corner to maintain consistency in the secondary or could see Sutton, a battle-tested and confident cover corner, as a quality consolation prize. Scouts will want a full medical evaluation on Sutton after he was knocked out of Tennessee's third game of the season with an ankle injury that Vols head coach Butch Jones said would keep his star corner out for "an extended period of time."
17. Oakland Raiders
Marlon Humphrey , CB, Alabama: After a brilliant debut last year for the national champion Crimson Tide, scouts are already buzzing about Humphrey, a redshirt sophomore seemingly ticketed for a first-round selection soon. Oakland general manager Reggie McKenzie has been willing to gamble before and has a "scout" on staff who knows Humphrey better than most, former Alabama teammate Amari Cooper .
18. New York Giants
Roderick Johnson , OT, Florida State Seminoles : For the first time in modern franchise history, the Giants did not select an offensive or defensive lineman in the 2019 draft. Reinforcements could be needed next year up front with Johnson possessing the bulk and feet to project as a long-time starter.
19. New York Jets
Budda Baker , FS, Washington: Ball-hawking safeties are all the rage in the NFL and Baker has the instincts and athleticism to star in centerfield. The silky smooth Baker enters his junior campaign already a two-time All-Pac-12 pick. He headlines a Washington secondary that might just be the best in the country.
20. Baltimore Ravens
Mike Williams , WR, Clemson: Now fully recovered from the neck injury which forced him to miss virtually all of last season, Williams could overtake USC's Smith-Schuster as the top receiver in this class. The 6-3, 220-pounder is athletically in the same class as former Clemson stars Sammy Watkins and DeAndre Hopkins and is a proven commodity with 57 receptions for 1,030 yards and six scores as a true sophomore in 2014. He could be a godsend for a Ravens team lacking healthy playmakers.
21. Kansas City Chiefs
Zach Cunningham , OLB, Vanderbilt Commodores : Cunningham isn't a nationally recognized name (yet) but the Commodores star is well known in the SEC, especially among coaches who voted him to the First Team squad with 16.5 tackles for loss and four forced fumbles in 2015 -- more than any Vandy defender this century. He could be an ideal apprentice for Derrick Johnson , who will turn 34 this season.
22. Indianapolis Colts
Dalvin Cook , RB, Florida State: Adding some juice to the backfield in Indianapolis could be the perfect way to support Andrew Luck and few are better than Cook, who last season shattered Florida State's all-time single-season all-purpose record with 1,691 yards - nearly 450 more than the great Warrick Dunn registered 20 years earlier.
23. Philadelphia Eagles (from Minnesota Golden Gophers )
Mike McGlinchey , OT, Notre Dame: The Eagles gave up their first-round pick to move up for Carson Wentz , then recouped a first-rounder by dealing Sam Bradford and clearing the way for Wentz. Philadelphia needs to protect that investment and LT Jason Peters is 34. McGlinchey, 6-7 and 310 pounds, impressed at right tackle opposite 2019 first round pick Ronnie Stanley last year and has a chance to boost his grade this fall on the left side as his replacement.
24. Dallas Cowboys
O.J. Howard , TE, Alabama: Gavin Escobar is a nice player but he is not a true long-term replacement for Jason Witten , whose lack of speed is starting to catch up with him. Howard, on the other hand, does have this kind of seam-breaking ability.
25. Arizona Cardinals
Chad Kelly , QB, Ole Miss Rebels : As long as Carson Palmer stays healthy, the Cardinals are a legitimate Super Bowl contender. Nevertheless, the club would like to find a young quarterback to groom behind him. Bruce Arians and GM Steve Keim could be intrigued by the strong-armed and passionate Kelly, the nephew of the Buffalo Bills Hall of Fame quarterback.
26. Carolina Panthers
Charles Harris , DE, Missouri Tigers : The Panthers are currently set along the defensive line but with Charles Johnson on a one-year deal, Dave Gettleman likely would not pass on adding an athletic edge rusher like Harris - who led the SEC with 18.5 tackles for loss last year -- if given the opportunity to add to his collection of "hog mollies."
27. Cincinnati Bengals
Royce Freeman , RB, Oregon Ducks : The Bengals are hopeful that Jeremy Hill bounces back in a big way this season after a disappointing 2015 campaign. If not, this year's running back class certainly offers plenty of talented options, including the powerful Freeman, a bullish runner very much in the mold of former Oregon star Jonathan Stewart . NFL team will want a full medical evaluation on Freeman after he was knocked out of Oregon's Sept. 17 loss to Nebraska Cornhuskers , and was later seen walking on crutches and with a boot on his right foot.
28. Denver Broncos
Tre'Davious White , CB, LSU: With Aqib Talib , Chris Harris , Jr., and Bradley Roby , the Broncos possess arguably the league's top trio at cornerback. Big contracts and Talib's propensity for trouble off the field, however, could push John Elway to consider taking advantage of this year's strong cornerback class. White is a fluid athlete with the loose hips and light feet to make an impact in coverage and on special teams.
29. Green Bay Packers
Raekwon McMillan , ILB, Ohio State Buckeyes : It seems the Packers are annually in search of athletic linebackers. Powerful, athletic and eager to emerge from the shadows cast by his former teammates at Ohio State, Miller could be end to Green Bay's troubles at the position.
30. Pittsburgh Steelers
Dan Feeney , OG, Indiana Hoosiers : Just two of the club's past 33 draft picks have been used on blockers. Feeney, a returning All-American who considered leaving school early for the NFL last year, is powerful, athletic and technically sound -- among the reasons why he has only allowed one sack in his three-plus seasons as a starter.
31. Seattle Seahawks
Bucky Hodges , TE, Virginia Tech Hokies : The Seahawks remain hopeful, of course, that Jimmy Graham will return to the dominant form he showed prior to last season's horrific ruptured patella tendon. If not, tight end could be a position to watch for Seattle next spring and Hodges is exactly the type of freakish athlete coach Pete Carroll and GM John Schneider prefer.
32. New England Patriots
Desmond King , CB, Iowa Hawkeyes : Questions about his pure speed pushed King back to Iowa for his senior season (despite his winning the Thorpe Award) and it could push him down the board on draft day, as well. While perhaps lacking in this area, King's instincts, physicality and ballskills are top notch, making him potentially a terrific fit in Foxborough.
Round 1
1. Cleveland Browns
Myles Garrett, DE, Texas A&M: Clearly, the No. 1 concern in Cleveland should be at quarterback but with an NFL-best 13 projected picks in the 2019 draft, the Browns do not necessarily need to make one the first pick of the draft. The 6-5, 262-pound Garrett has been a dominant pass rusher for the Aggies with 23.5 sacks over his first two seasons and is the No. 1 overall prospect in college football.
2. San Francisco 49ers
Deshaun Watson, QB, Clemson: Chip Kelly and the 49ers need help at quarterback even more than the Browns, and would likely be thrilled with Watson still on the board. The 2015 Heisman finalist possesses an exciting blend of athleticism, arm and smarts and wouldn't face the same challenges of acclimating to a pro-style scheme if playing for Kelly, whose up-tempo attack is similar to the one Watson has starred in at Clemson.
3. San Diego Chargers
Jabrill Peppers, SS, Michigan: Reinforcements along the offensive line or wide receiver are always possibilities in San Diego, but I think the Chargers also miss Eric Weddle at safety. Linebacker, safety, cornerback, returner - put him wherever you'd like - Peppers is a natural playmaker with the instincts and athleticism to carry over his success and versatility into the NFL. Teams are wary of young players and as only a redshirt sophomore, Peppers is certainly that but scouts are excited about his upside.
4. Jacksonville Jaguars
Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama: Frankly, I'd be shocked if the Jags are selecting this high - I think they are a legitimate contender to win the AFC South this year - but if once again picking in the top five, then the club could be looking for an upgrade at left guard, where Luke Joeckel - the No. 2 overall pick back in 2013 - is entering the final year of his rookie contract. Robinson isn't as polished in pass protection as Joeckel, but he's a mauler in the running game whose power and competitiveness could give the Jaguars some growl up front.
5. Tennessee Titans
Teez Tabor, CB, Florida: Some clubs seem to annually struggle at certain positions and with not a single cornerback from Tennessee in the modern era having earned multiple Pro Bowl nods, general manager Jon Robinson could be looking for an upgrade at the position. Tabor reminds scouts of former Florida standouts Vernon Hargreaves III and Joe Haden with his easy athleticism and knack for big plays.
6. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
SPONSORED BY COMCAST
Don’t get blindsided by DIRECTV
What happens when you sign up for DIRECTV’s latest deal? You get locked into a 2-year contract that can cost you over $3300. Make the right choice and switch to XFINITY X1.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, WR, Southern California: Sure, the Bucs already boast two of the NFL's bigger receivers in Mike Evans and Vincent Jackson, but the former is coming off of a disappointing sophomore season and the latter is 33 and a pending free agent. The 6-2, 220-pound Smith-Schuster isn't just big, he's powerful and highly competitive, making him potentially a perfect candidate to push Evans (and QB Jameis Winston) into maximizing their own undeniable potential.
7. New Orleans Saints
Jonathan Allen, DT, Alabama: While rookie Sheldon Rankins should make an immediate impact and Cam Jordan remains one of the NFL's best, the latest injury to pass rusher Hau'oli Kikaha (torn ACL) only reinforces New Orleans' lack of depth up front. Adding the versatile Allen to the mix would be a big help.
8. Detroit Lions
Leonard Fournette, RB, LSU: As arguably the best prospect in the country, Fournette should go higher than this, but the teams projected to select earlier than Detroit are already loaded (or at least heavily invested) at running back. Fournette is an exceptional talent, offering a combination of size, power and speed unmatched by any college back since Adrian Peterson. And as a division rival of his, the Lions know better than most the impact a superstar runner can have on a club.
9. Cleveland Browns (from Philadelphia)
DeShone Kizer, QB, Notre Dame: The Browns will almost certainly be spending yet another early pick on a quarterback. Kizer is only a redshirt sophomore but his combination of size, arm talent and composure, thus far, has the look of a future top 10 pick.
10. Miami Dolphins
Christian McCaffrey, RB, Stanford: If the trio of Arian Foster, Jay Ajayi and Kenyan Drake does not result in the production Miami is looking for in 2019, the Dolphins could find immediate help in the form of McCaffrey, a do-it-all threat perfectly suited to Adam Gase's up-tempo offense.
11. Tennessee Titans (from Los Angeles)
Tim Williams, OLB, Alabama: The Titans already boast two solid veteran edge rushers in Brian Orakpo and Derrick Morgan but with only 11.5 combined sacks from them last year (7.0 from Orakpo), the club could be looking to add some competition to the position. Williams has been largely a pass rush specialist for the Tide thus far, but he could learn quickly as an apprentice under Tennessee' two 30-year old outside linebackers.
12. Washington Redskins
Malik McDowell, DT, Michigan State: The culture in Washington is changing with general manager Scot McClougan valuing toughness and physicality over raw athleticism. At 6-6, 285 pounds, McDowell has the length and power to play all over the defensive line.
13. Atlanta Falcons
Reuben Foster , ILB, Alabama: The Falcons took a big step toward improving their overall physicality with the selection of safety Keanu Neal in the first round last spring. Foster, arguably the most explosive hitter in the country, would reinforce the club's goal of regaining its nastiness on defense.
14. Chicago Bears
Jamal Adams , SS, LSU: The Bears have been looking for a tone-setter at safety for years. Adams possesses the range, agility and playmaking ability to warrant comparison to former LSU (and current Arizona Cardinals ) star Tyrann Mathieu and is bigger at 6-feet, 211 pounds.
15. Houston Texans
Lowell Lotulelei, DT, Utah: The Texans have quietly assembled one of the better young rosters in the NFL. One of the obvious exceptions is at nose guard, where the aging (34) and increasingly rotund (listed at 325) Vince Wilfork is still eating up blocks. Like his older brother, Star, Lotulelei offers power and bulk at the point of attack and could earn early-round consideration if he continues to develop.
16. Buffalo Bills
Cameron Sutton , CB, Tennessee: The Bills are in fine shape at cornerback as long as the team re-signs pending free agent Stephon Gilmore in the offseason. Buffalo Bulls could opt to place the franchise tag on the talented cover corner to maintain consistency in the secondary or could see Sutton, a battle-tested and confident cover corner, as a quality consolation prize. Scouts will want a full medical evaluation on Sutton after he was knocked out of Tennessee's third game of the season with an ankle injury that Vols head coach Butch Jones said would keep his star corner out for "an extended period of time."
17. Oakland Raiders
Marlon Humphrey , CB, Alabama: After a brilliant debut last year for the national champion Crimson Tide, scouts are already buzzing about Humphrey, a redshirt sophomore seemingly ticketed for a first-round selection soon. Oakland general manager Reggie McKenzie has been willing to gamble before and has a "scout" on staff who knows Humphrey better than most, former Alabama teammate Amari Cooper .
18. New York Giants
Roderick Johnson , OT, Florida State Seminoles : For the first time in modern franchise history, the Giants did not select an offensive or defensive lineman in the 2019 draft. Reinforcements could be needed next year up front with Johnson possessing the bulk and feet to project as a long-time starter.
19. New York Jets
Budda Baker , FS, Washington: Ball-hawking safeties are all the rage in the NFL and Baker has the instincts and athleticism to star in centerfield. The silky smooth Baker enters his junior campaign already a two-time All-Pac-12 pick. He headlines a Washington secondary that might just be the best in the country.
20. Baltimore Ravens
Mike Williams , WR, Clemson: Now fully recovered from the neck injury which forced him to miss virtually all of last season, Williams could overtake USC's Smith-Schuster as the top receiver in this class. The 6-3, 220-pounder is athletically in the same class as former Clemson stars Sammy Watkins and DeAndre Hopkins and is a proven commodity with 57 receptions for 1,030 yards and six scores as a true sophomore in 2014. He could be a godsend for a Ravens team lacking healthy playmakers.
21. Kansas City Chiefs
Zach Cunningham , OLB, Vanderbilt Commodores : Cunningham isn't a nationally recognized name (yet) but the Commodores star is well known in the SEC, especially among coaches who voted him to the First Team squad with 16.5 tackles for loss and four forced fumbles in 2015 -- more than any Vandy defender this century. He could be an ideal apprentice for Derrick Johnson , who will turn 34 this season.
22. Indianapolis Colts
Dalvin Cook , RB, Florida State: Adding some juice to the backfield in Indianapolis could be the perfect way to support Andrew Luck and few are better than Cook, who last season shattered Florida State's all-time single-season all-purpose record with 1,691 yards - nearly 450 more than the great Warrick Dunn registered 20 years earlier.
23. Philadelphia Eagles (from Minnesota Golden Gophers )
Mike McGlinchey , OT, Notre Dame: The Eagles gave up their first-round pick to move up for Carson Wentz , then recouped a first-rounder by dealing Sam Bradford and clearing the way for Wentz. Philadelphia needs to protect that investment and LT Jason Peters is 34. McGlinchey, 6-7 and 310 pounds, impressed at right tackle opposite 2019 first round pick Ronnie Stanley last year and has a chance to boost his grade this fall on the left side as his replacement.
24. Dallas Cowboys
O.J. Howard , TE, Alabama: Gavin Escobar is a nice player but he is not a true long-term replacement for Jason Witten , whose lack of speed is starting to catch up with him. Howard, on the other hand, does have this kind of seam-breaking ability.
25. Arizona Cardinals
Chad Kelly , QB, Ole Miss Rebels : As long as Carson Palmer stays healthy, the Cardinals are a legitimate Super Bowl contender. Nevertheless, the club would like to find a young quarterback to groom behind him. Bruce Arians and GM Steve Keim could be intrigued by the strong-armed and passionate Kelly, the nephew of the Buffalo Bills Hall of Fame quarterback.
26. Carolina Panthers
Charles Harris , DE, Missouri Tigers : The Panthers are currently set along the defensive line but with Charles Johnson on a one-year deal, Dave Gettleman likely would not pass on adding an athletic edge rusher like Harris - who led the SEC with 18.5 tackles for loss last year -- if given the opportunity to add to his collection of "hog mollies."
27. Cincinnati Bengals
Royce Freeman , RB, Oregon Ducks : The Bengals are hopeful that Jeremy Hill bounces back in a big way this season after a disappointing 2015 campaign. If not, this year's running back class certainly offers plenty of talented options, including the powerful Freeman, a bullish runner very much in the mold of former Oregon star Jonathan Stewart . NFL team will want a full medical evaluation on Freeman after he was knocked out of Oregon's Sept. 17 loss to Nebraska Cornhuskers , and was later seen walking on crutches and with a boot on his right foot.
28. Denver Broncos
Tre'Davious White , CB, LSU: With Aqib Talib , Chris Harris , Jr., and Bradley Roby , the Broncos possess arguably the league's top trio at cornerback. Big contracts and Talib's propensity for trouble off the field, however, could push John Elway to consider taking advantage of this year's strong cornerback class. White is a fluid athlete with the loose hips and light feet to make an impact in coverage and on special teams.
29. Green Bay Packers
Raekwon McMillan , ILB, Ohio State Buckeyes : It seems the Packers are annually in search of athletic linebackers. Powerful, athletic and eager to emerge from the shadows cast by his former teammates at Ohio State, Miller could be end to Green Bay's troubles at the position.
30. Pittsburgh Steelers
Dan Feeney , OG, Indiana Hoosiers : Just two of the club's past 33 draft picks have been used on blockers. Feeney, a returning All-American who considered leaving school early for the NFL last year, is powerful, athletic and technically sound -- among the reasons why he has only allowed one sack in his three-plus seasons as a starter.
31. Seattle Seahawks
Bucky Hodges , TE, Virginia Tech Hokies : The Seahawks remain hopeful, of course, that Jimmy Graham will return to the dominant form he showed prior to last season's horrific ruptured patella tendon. If not, tight end could be a position to watch for Seattle next spring and Hodges is exactly the type of freakish athlete coach Pete Carroll and GM John Schneider prefer.
32. New England Patriots
Desmond King , CB, Iowa Hawkeyes : Questions about his pure speed pushed King back to Iowa for his senior season (despite his winning the Thorpe Award) and it could push him down the board on draft day, as well. While perhaps lacking in this area, King's instincts, physicality and ballskills are top notch, making him potentially a terrific fit in Foxborough.
NFL Draft 2019 Quarterbacks
Wentz is probably going to be the second quarterback selected in the 2019 NFL Draft behind California's Jared Goff, but in my opinion, Wentz is the best quarterback prospect and it isn't even close. I've spoken with a lot of teams that feel that way as well, but Los Angeles appears poised to take Goff.
In January, sources from other teams said they had Wentz as the best quarterback prospect in the 2019 NFL Draft, and nothing has changed from that after the combine and his pro day. Wentz was terrific at both and clearly has established himself as the best signal-caller in the 2019 NFL Draft. He showed his powerful arm, footwork, mobility and accuracy at both events.
In early January, WalterFootball.com was the first to report that the Browns' initial preference was for Wentz over California's Jared Goff. At the combine, Cleveland sources said that Wentz was a "stud" in his interview, while Goff didn't interview as well. On the field, Wentz was the most impressive quarterback in Indianapolis. He also had an excellent Senior Bowl that showed off his big arm, ball placement, field vision and athleticism.
Multiple teams have told me they think that Wentz is the real deal. They say that Wentz has a good arm, size and athleticism, plus they love him off the field. They also like his pocket presence, field vision, experience under center, ability to make play calls in the huddle, and potential to grow in the NFL. They believe that he will fill out his frame in a NFL strength and conditioning program. The big challenge for Wentz, in their view, will be the drastic change in the speed of the game coming from North Dakota State's opponents compared to the NFL. He also will need to mature into a leadership role.
On top of his good arm, mobility, pocket presence, field vision and accuracy. Wentz operated in a pro-style system with play calls in the huddle and working under center. In 2015, he completed 64 percent of his passes for 1,669 yards with 16 touchdowns and two interceptions while missing almost half the year with a broken wrist. Wentz also had four rushing touchdowns.
As a junior, Wentz completed 64 percent of his passes for 3,111 yard with 25 touchdowns and six interceptions. He also had six touchdowns on the ground. Wentz was a backup as a freshman and sophomore. North Dakota State won the National Championship in both seasons of Wentz being the starter.
In January, sources from other teams said they had Wentz as the best quarterback prospect in the 2019 NFL Draft, and nothing has changed from that after the combine and his pro day. Wentz was terrific at both and clearly has established himself as the best signal-caller in the 2019 NFL Draft. He showed his powerful arm, footwork, mobility and accuracy at both events.
In early January, WalterFootball.com was the first to report that the Browns' initial preference was for Wentz over California's Jared Goff. At the combine, Cleveland sources said that Wentz was a "stud" in his interview, while Goff didn't interview as well. On the field, Wentz was the most impressive quarterback in Indianapolis. He also had an excellent Senior Bowl that showed off his big arm, ball placement, field vision and athleticism.
Multiple teams have told me they think that Wentz is the real deal. They say that Wentz has a good arm, size and athleticism, plus they love him off the field. They also like his pocket presence, field vision, experience under center, ability to make play calls in the huddle, and potential to grow in the NFL. They believe that he will fill out his frame in a NFL strength and conditioning program. The big challenge for Wentz, in their view, will be the drastic change in the speed of the game coming from North Dakota State's opponents compared to the NFL. He also will need to mature into a leadership role.
On top of his good arm, mobility, pocket presence, field vision and accuracy. Wentz operated in a pro-style system with play calls in the huddle and working under center. In 2015, he completed 64 percent of his passes for 1,669 yards with 16 touchdowns and two interceptions while missing almost half the year with a broken wrist. Wentz also had four rushing touchdowns.
As a junior, Wentz completed 64 percent of his passes for 3,111 yard with 25 touchdowns and six interceptions. He also had six touchdowns on the ground. Wentz was a backup as a freshman and sophomore. North Dakota State won the National Championship in both seasons of Wentz being the starter.
jueves, 15 de septiembre de 2016
84th annual meeting
The 8erd annual meeting of National Football League (NFL) will be the 2019 NFL Draft to franchises to select newly eligible football players.
Round two
Philadelphia → St. Louis (PD). Philadelphia traded their second-round selection in this year's draft, a 2015 fourth-round selection and quarterback Nick Foles to St. Louis in exchange for St. Louis' 2015 fifth-round selection and quarterback Sam Bradford. The trade also includes a possible conditional selection in this year's draft going to Philadelphia based on Bradford's playing time in 2015. If Bradford takes less than 50 percent of the snaps, Philadelphia will receive St. Louis' fourth-round selection; the selection will upgrade to a third-rounder if Bradford does not play at all in 2015.
Round three
Detroit → Philadelphia (PD). Detroit traded their third-round selection in this year's draft to Philadelphia in exchange for a fourth-round selection in the 2015 NFL Draft (113th used to draft defensive tackle Gabe Wright).
Round four
Denver → Baltimore (PD). Denver traded this selection to Baltimore in exchange for Baltimore's fifth-round selection and center Gino Gradkowski.[source 3]
St. Louis → Philadelphia (PD). see Philadelphia → St. Louis (round two). This conditional selection will return to St. Louis if Bradford plays more than 50 percent of the snaps in 2015 or can become a third-round selection if Bradford does not play at all.
Round five
Baltimore → Denver (PD). see Denver → Baltimore (round four).
Denver → Detroit (PD). Denver traded this selection, their 2015 first- and fifth-round selections and guard/center Manny Ramirez to Detroit in exchange for Detroit's 2014 first-round selection.
San Diego → San Francisco (PD). San Diego traded this selection, and their 2015 first- and fourth-round selections, in exchange for San Francisco's 2015 first-round selection.[source 5]
Round six
Dallas → San Francisco (PD). Dallas traded this selection to San Francisco in exchange for San Francisco's 2015 seventh-round selection (246th).
New Orleans → Washington (PD). New Orleans traded this selection along with their sixth-round selection in the 2015 NFL draft (187th) to Washington in exchange for Washington's fifth-round selection.
Washington → Tampa Bay (PD). Washington traded this selection to Tampa Bay in exchange for Tampa Bay's seventh-round selection and safety Dashon Goldson.
Round seven
Buffalo → Minnesota (PD). Buffalo traded this selection and a 2015 fifth-round selection to Minnesota in exchange for quarterback Matt Cassel and Minnesota's 2015 sixth-round selection.
Houston → New England (PD). Houston traded their seventh–round selection in the 2019 draft to New England in exchange for quarterback Ryan Mallett. The pick could have been a sixth–round selection but Mallett did not play 40% of the snaps in 2014.
New York Jets → Houston (PD). The Jets traded a conditional seventh-round round selection in the 2019 draft to Houston in exchange for quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick. The pick can become a sixth-round selection based on Fitzpatrick's playing time.
St. Louis → Houston (PD). St.Louis traded this selection to Houston in exchange for quarterback Case Keenum.
Tampa Bay → Washington (PD). see Washington → Tampa Bay (round six).
Forfeited picks
Atlanta will forfeit their fifth-round selection as the punishment for piping artificial crowd noise into the Georgia Dome during the 2013 and 2014 seasons. If Atlanta receives multiple fifth-round selections, the team will forfeit the highest selection.
New England will forfeit their first-round selection as the punishment for the team's Deflategate scandal. If New England receives multiple first-round selections, the team will forfeit the highest selection. The team will also forfeit a 2017 fourth-round selection.
Round two
Philadelphia → St. Louis (PD). Philadelphia traded their second-round selection in this year's draft, a 2015 fourth-round selection and quarterback Nick Foles to St. Louis in exchange for St. Louis' 2015 fifth-round selection and quarterback Sam Bradford. The trade also includes a possible conditional selection in this year's draft going to Philadelphia based on Bradford's playing time in 2015. If Bradford takes less than 50 percent of the snaps, Philadelphia will receive St. Louis' fourth-round selection; the selection will upgrade to a third-rounder if Bradford does not play at all in 2015.
Round three
Detroit → Philadelphia (PD). Detroit traded their third-round selection in this year's draft to Philadelphia in exchange for a fourth-round selection in the 2015 NFL Draft (113th used to draft defensive tackle Gabe Wright).
Round four
Denver → Baltimore (PD). Denver traded this selection to Baltimore in exchange for Baltimore's fifth-round selection and center Gino Gradkowski.[source 3]
St. Louis → Philadelphia (PD). see Philadelphia → St. Louis (round two). This conditional selection will return to St. Louis if Bradford plays more than 50 percent of the snaps in 2015 or can become a third-round selection if Bradford does not play at all.
Round five
Baltimore → Denver (PD). see Denver → Baltimore (round four).
Denver → Detroit (PD). Denver traded this selection, their 2015 first- and fifth-round selections and guard/center Manny Ramirez to Detroit in exchange for Detroit's 2014 first-round selection.
San Diego → San Francisco (PD). San Diego traded this selection, and their 2015 first- and fourth-round selections, in exchange for San Francisco's 2015 first-round selection.[source 5]
Round six
Dallas → San Francisco (PD). Dallas traded this selection to San Francisco in exchange for San Francisco's 2015 seventh-round selection (246th).
New Orleans → Washington (PD). New Orleans traded this selection along with their sixth-round selection in the 2015 NFL draft (187th) to Washington in exchange for Washington's fifth-round selection.
Washington → Tampa Bay (PD). Washington traded this selection to Tampa Bay in exchange for Tampa Bay's seventh-round selection and safety Dashon Goldson.
Round seven
Buffalo → Minnesota (PD). Buffalo traded this selection and a 2015 fifth-round selection to Minnesota in exchange for quarterback Matt Cassel and Minnesota's 2015 sixth-round selection.
Houston → New England (PD). Houston traded their seventh–round selection in the 2019 draft to New England in exchange for quarterback Ryan Mallett. The pick could have been a sixth–round selection but Mallett did not play 40% of the snaps in 2014.
New York Jets → Houston (PD). The Jets traded a conditional seventh-round round selection in the 2019 draft to Houston in exchange for quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick. The pick can become a sixth-round selection based on Fitzpatrick's playing time.
St. Louis → Houston (PD). St.Louis traded this selection to Houston in exchange for quarterback Case Keenum.
Tampa Bay → Washington (PD). see Washington → Tampa Bay (round six).
Forfeited picks
Atlanta will forfeit their fifth-round selection as the punishment for piping artificial crowd noise into the Georgia Dome during the 2013 and 2014 seasons. If Atlanta receives multiple fifth-round selections, the team will forfeit the highest selection.
New England will forfeit their first-round selection as the punishment for the team's Deflategate scandal. If New England receives multiple first-round selections, the team will forfeit the highest selection. The team will also forfeit a 2017 fourth-round selection.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)